Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Although it is impossible to totally eliminate human error from the process, halachic supervision is required because of errors such as these. Halachic supervision reduces the risk of human error to levels near zero. An independent pair of eyes is crucial to the process.
To see the full story click here Today Show Embryo Error
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Supervision & Male Fertility Preservation In the early days of the development of modern scientific fertility treatments, poskim, concerned about the potential for laboratory errors leading to the use of the wrong genetic materials, ruled that such treatments were impermissible. Several highly publicized cases of IVF babies being implanted into the wrong female confirmed their fears.
The onset of halachically supervised fertility treatments dramatically changed the halachic realities. Such supervision requires the presence of a third party supervisor whose job it is to prevent any potential mistakes of human error and ensure that any children born of such methods are the genetic products of the intended parents.
Supervision is not limited to IVF, appropriate supervision is halachically essential for all forms of fertility treatments in which genetic material is processed outside the body for eventual use in the birth of a child. This includes male fertility preservation, our topic of the past few weeks.
In the example we have discussed, a male cancer patient facing potential infertility as a result of his upcoming medical treatments, the need for supervision is paramount, in order to ensure that his frozen sperm sample is "certified" as belonging to him, allowing it to be used for fertilization procedures with his wife. Unfortunately, in the frantic rush to (a) make sure that the patient's sperm is preserved prior to beginning critically needed medical treatment on a timely basis and (b) preserve multiple samples of material for preservation, supervision sometimes gets overlooked.
I recently met with representatives of large organization that works with families who have children with cancer. As part of their services, they regularly refer young men for fertility preservation and through no fault of their own had never even considered the necessity of supervision in such cases. After explaining the process and halachic need for such supervision to them, they immediately changed their protocols and now recommend supervision to all their client families. Not only does supervision ensure that the process if overseen according to halacha, in this case there is an additional benefit.
The young terminally ill patients we are discussing are often frightened and concerned. They may never have ever been to a hospital before becoming ill, and are suddenly subjected to a battery of tests and treatments and told that their treatment may affect their fertility. Having someone meet them at the clinic to assist them, guide them and comfort them, to know that there is someone looking out for them in the lab and be assured that at least this part of the procedure is in good religious hands is a huge reassurance for them and a wonderful aid for their eventual recovery.
NEXT: Female Fertility Preservation
Monday, June 1, 2009
Sacrificing One to Save Another Last week we started discussing the case of the woman who is pregnant with a multi-fetal pregnancy and we are concerned that she will not be able to carry the pregnancy and may lose all of the unborn children. In this case the doctors suggest that she reduce some of the embryos in order to save the others.
The question is whether this is permitted by the halacha?
Rav Zilberstein quoted the section of Talmud that we are not allowed to sacrifice the life of one Jew by giving him over to the gentiles who will kill him, even if they will then kill all of the others. However we mentioned the case of Yonah where the sailors do "kill" Yonah in order to save themselves and they are not punished for this.
There are opinions (such as the Tiferet L'Moshe quoted in the Pitchei T'shuva) that if the gentiles will kill everyone then they are permitted to draw lots and to give over the person who was picked by the lottery to save the others. He brings Yonah as an example that this is permitted.
Many disagree with this, and Rav Zilberstein quotes from the Sefer Chasidim that they cannot draw lots to "sacrifice" one of them as was done in the case of Yonah. However in another place the Sefer Chasidim writes "if people were in a ship and a great storm came against them to drown them, but all the other ships are sailing safely, then we know that there must be someone on their ship who is liable and they are permitted to draw lots and throw him into the sea." As happened to Yonah. These two quotes seem to contradict each other, however, a close reading reveals that they are dealing with different scenarios. In the second case all of the other ships pass safely and so the indication from heaven is that there must be a person on this specific ship who is the cause. The Midrash does say that in the case of Yonah the sailors saw that all the other ships passed by safely, and only the ship that Yonah sailed on was threatened by the storm. So here we see that there are cases in which we can permit killing one person to save others. However this still seems to be only in very specific cases where there is a Divine indication that this is what should be done. More on this next week. The Puah Institute for Fertility and Gynecology in Accordance with Halacha is based in Jerusalem and helps couples from all over the world who are experiencing fertility problems. Puah offers free counseling in five languages, halachic supervision, and educational programs. Puah has offices in New York, Los Angeles and Paris. To contact the Puah Institute please call 1-800-071111 in Israel or in the US 718-336-0603. website: www.puahonline.org
Monday, May 25, 2009
One of the most annoying things that every woman who has experienced infertility has heard is "just relax and it will happen." Unfortunately, it is not that easy for most women who are experiencing infertility.
However, it has been proven that "stress" does inhibit fertility. Being stressed can inhibit or delay ovulation. In men, it can reduce sperm counts.
Going through fertility treatments is one of the most stressful things you can go through: early morning appointments for blood tests and ultrasounds, injecting yourself or being injected with drugs everyday. There is stress along the way worrying if everything is going as it should. Add to this the financial strain of paying for the treatments and the difficulties of being late to work. And then the worst of all is the 2 week wait when you wait to find out if it worked for if it was all for nothing and you will have to return to square one and start all over again!
Reducing stress is one way to increase your odds of success.
Some suggestions for reducing stress:
- Alternative healers. Do acupuncture, shiatsu, reflexology. Whatever you can fit into your schedule without it being more stressful (ie whatever you can schedule conveniently and isn't too big of a stain financially).
- Listen to meditative music. In particular if you are doing an IUI or IVF, take along some music to listen to before/after procedures.
- Listen to (or watch) something funny. There's nothing like a good laugh to make you feel better.
- Treat yourself when you need to.
What do you do to reduce your stress levels?
Can you suggest any great meditative music?
Can you suggest any funny podcasts?
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Is a Fetus Alive? (part 2)
Last week we discussed the position of Rabbi Waldenberg as recorded in his responsa, Tzitz Eliezer, that the unborn child is not considered to be alive in the eyes of the halacha. He based this opinion on the understanding of the Rambam, and particularly the relation between the words of the Rambam and those of the Mishna.
But another halachic giant held the exact opposite; Rabbi Moshe Feinstein stated that the Rambam was clearly of the opinion that the unborn child is considered to be alive. Therefore, Rabbi Feinstein wrote, the Rambam had to employ the concept of the rodef in order to permit terminating a pregnancy, even when the mother's life is in danger. Since the fetus is alive and the mother is alive and we can only save one and not the other, it is forbidden to kill one person even in order to save another. However if one is a rodef then he must be killed to save the other. Therefore, Rabbi Feinstein held that it is forbidden to terminate a pregnancy under any circumstances, even if the child is ill and even if he will not be able to live afterwards. He was of the opinion that the pregnancy should continue and the child be born even if he will die soon afterwards. Rabbi Feinstein writes that he felt a need to be strict in light of the large numbers of unwarranted abortions and that we need to take a stand and stop this wherever possible. He writes that he was shocked to see the opinion of Rabbi Waldenberg who allowed the termination of a pregnancy and he felt that one should not rely on this lenient opinion. There is still, though, a question that remains. How come the unborn child is a rodef before he is born but not after he is born, when he still endangers the mother? Rabbi Feinstein answers that while we may not have a good answer to this it still does not compromise our halachic position since we see that none of the classic commentators on the Rambam disagree or even comment. We can therefore assume that the Rambam had an answer to this question, even if we do not know what it is. [Note that Rambam's word is K'RODEIF, like a Rodeif. Not a real one, but we will consider it so. - Ed.] He does offer one possible answer; that the unborn child is alive and has a soul but not a complete soul, and when we have to decide between saving the mother or saving the fetus, we save her. However when he is born they are on the same halachic level and so we are incapable of deciding who to save and must let nature take its course. So we see that two halachic authorities of the same generation gave complete opposite psak based on the same Rambam. One allows the termination in certain cases and one does not allow it under any circumstance. In such a case a person needs to seek specific halachic guidance.
The Puah Institute for Fertility and Gynecology in Accordance with Halacha is based in Jerusalem and helps couples from all over the world who are experiencing fertility problems. Puah offers free counseling in five languages, halachic supervision, and educational programs. Puah has offices in New York, Los Angeles and Paris. To contact the Puah Institute please call 1-800-071111 in Israel or in the US 718-336-0603. website: www.puahonline.org
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Puah at the Israel Fertility Association conference
May 11, 2009
The Puah Institute left a meaningful impression at the Israel Fertility Association (IFA) annual conference that took place 11-12 of May at the Dan Panorama Hotel in Tel Aviv.
Rabbi Udi Rath of the Puah institute with Dr. Idit Ben-Yair of the Shifra Institute gave an oral presentation at the general forum about a new PCT introduced by the Puah Institute. A PCT is the first test of male infertility that is done by taking a swab from the woman shortly after intercourse. There is absolutely no halachic issue with this test since it is done on the woman. The problem in the past with the PCT test it is not often a good indication of whether there is an issue with the sperm. There are many couples who have a poor PCT who go on to have a good SA (sperm analysis), and there are many couples with a good PCT who go on to have male factor infertility.
Dr. Ben-Yair showed a strong correlation between the results of a regular sperm test (that is Halachicly problematic) and the new PCT in providing a good first picture of the male factor condition.
The presentation was marked as outstanding and was one of four candidates for the annual award of the IFA.
In addition Puah counselors presented three medical Halachic posters at the conference. The posters dealt with: egg donation, ovariectomies of BRCA carriers and cryopreservation of ovarian tissue and oocytes – all of which drew attention from medical crowd.
Saturday, May 9, 2009
Last week we saw the words of the Rambam, that the reason that the Mishna permits terminating a pregnancy when the mother's life is in danger is due to the law of rodef, the pursuer. If this is the case, then why does the Mishna forbid killing the half born child to save the mother, surely he is still considered a pursuer the entire time that the mother's life is in danger? The answer to this query on the Rambam can provide an answer as to the halachic status of the embryo; is he considered alive or not?
Rabbi Eliezer Waldenberg tz"l, the late halachic giant of Jerusalem, the posek for Sha'arei Zedek Hospital and one of the experts in halacha and medicine, was asked whether one can terminate the pregnancy of a fetus who is suffering from a serious congenital condition. In this case the mother was not in any immediate danger and so the case was not analogous with that of the Mishna. Rabbi Waldenberg allowed a termination to be performed based on the Mishna and on his understanding of the Rambam. He claimed that the Rambam was of the opinion that the unborn fetus is not considered alive since he does not have independent life; but once he is born he is considered a full life. The question then remains as to why did the Rambam employ the principle of the rodef? Rabbi Waldenberg answers, quoting a response of the Nodeh Biyhuda, that even though the fetus is not seen in the eyes of the halacha as being alive, still it has the halachic category of a treifa, a living being that does not have independent life. While it is less severe to kill a treifa than killing a person, still it is not permitted. However, since the fetus is endangering the mother and is a rodef, it is permitted to terminate the pregnancy. This would be the same if the fetus was suffering from a serious condition that would be very difficult to treat, in certain cases this would be grounds to terminate the pregnancy. One question remains, how come the fetus is only a rodef until he is born? Rabbi Waldenberg answers that the Rambam did not mean he is a rodef only that this situation is similar to the case of the rodef. He is like a rodef but not really a rodef and thus not all the laws of rodef are applicable. This is not a simple answer since the Rambam brings in this case in the first chapter of the laws of murder where he discusses the laws of rodef and brings this as a prime example. If it is only similar to a rodef then why does he bring this as the example? Also Rabbi Waldenberg understands that the word rodef in the Rambam is a noun, where there is evidence that it may be a verb which changes the understanding of the sentence. Still, Rabbi Waldenberg holds that the unborn fetus is not considered alive. Next week, the other side of the dispute...